April 11th lecture

Embryology   Biology 441   Spring 2008   Albert Harris

 

 

Asexual Development by Budding, Regeneration of Organs, and Sorting Out of Dissociated Cells

These phenomena have in common that bodies or parts of bodies get be formed in other ways than by embryonic development of an egg.

If scientists ever learn how to use embryonic stem cells to form replacement body parts, It may be essential to form these phenomena.

*********************************************************

Development of unfertilized oocytes, as occurs male ants & bees, etc. and many other insects, and in some species of fish and lizards:

Development of unfertilized eggs IS >asexual, but is accomplished by gastrulation, neurulation, germ layers etc. almost exactly as in normal embryonic development.

In male bees and ants, the resulting animals are haploid; but in many cases they become diploid by resorbing the second polar body.

*********************************************************

In some species, buds of somatic tissues form whole new animals.

Occurs in sponges, hydra, Corals, Bryozoa, & Tunicates

Although many of these are primitive, Tunicates (= Sea Squirts) are members of the same phylum as we are: Chordates

All of these can develop sometimes from fertilized eggs, but other times from buds of tissues within which cells rearrange (And/or cells re-differentiate) to form all the cells of their bodies).

For example, Hydra form eggs and sperm, which develop through embryonic stages of gastrulation, etc.

But mostly develop by asexual budding, in which differentiated cells rearrange.

About half the species of sea squirts are NOT colonial, and develop only from fertilized eggs.
But the other half of species develop sometimes by eggs & sperm and sometimes by asexual buds, in which many cells differentiate, and other cell types rearrange.

Budding of colonial sea squirts:
Includes transfer of many differentiated cells, through blood vessels, and/or by active cell crawling.

*********************************************************

John Allen, who recently earned his PhD in this department, observed that then ends of arms of sea urchin plutei sometimes bud off to form new blastula stage embryos, which can themselves develop into plutei.

I don't think much research has been done on this!
Do these broken off tips of arms gastrulate? Or what?

*********************************************************

Another phenomenon that can be regarded as asexual is "sorting out" of dissociated and randomly inter-mixed cells.

This has been reported in some species of colonial sea squirts (and also sponges, hydra, other cnideria, and also larval sea urchins) as H.V.Wilson was the first to discover this phenomenon (in sponges) and later Wilson also discovered sorting-out in corals:

Randomly mixed cells rearrange to form normally-functioning individuals.

*********************************************************

AS WE ALREADY LEARNED EARLIER IN THIS COURSE

Dissociated amphibian embryo cells sort out by germ layer, and by subdivision of germ layers, but can't form frog or salamander bodies, just tissues and some organs, in abnormal geometrical patterns.

These phenomena were discovered and described in many research papers by Johannes Holtfreter.
(especially a long paper by Townes & Holtfreter in J. Experimental Zoology about 1955, in which the results of all possible germ layer combinations are described)

In the 1950s, Moscona and Trinkaus (separately) proved that embryonic mouse and chicken tissues can be dissociated Into random mixtures of cells, and then sort out by differentiated cell type (but can't re-form functional animals, but only tissues and organs)

This led to the discovery of selective cell-cell adhesion proteins, including N-CAM ("Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule") and several kinds of Cadherins. ("Cadherin E, Cadherin P", many others)

*********************************************************

Debates on whether sorting out of dissociated cells is because of qualitative differences (in kind of adhesion molecules) or because of quantitative differences (in amount of adhesion):

Steinberg's "Differential Adhesion Hypothesis"
<< minimization of free energy of adhesion >>

Evidence: transitive hierarchy of internal versus external position of sorting out

Alternative hypothetical explanations by Harris (1976) and Brodland (2005) " differential cell surface contraction hypothesis"

simulations of cell sorting

This link is to computer simulations of different scientists' explanations of cell sorting. This is the web site of Dr. Wayne Brodland, at the University of Waterloo in Ontario.

*********************************************************

Regeneration of Organs:

Humans can regenerate liver tissue (two-thirds or more)

And if one human kidney is removed, then the other enlarges to almost double size. Such enlargement is called "hypertrophy"

*********************************************************

A FUNDAMENTAL QUESTION THAT USUALLY ISN'T ASKED:

Do these regeneration & sorting out phenomena imply or require some mechanism that normally inhibits growth of liver and kidney cells when these organs are normal size.

In other words, should we think of regeneration As some kind of de-inhibition?

Or should we think of regeneration as some kind of stimulation?

Our own epidermis is constantly replaced (and this replacement will speed up when and where many epidermal cells are artificially removed).
Much research has been done on this using mice.

An old hypothesis was that "chalone" (a hypothetical substance) constantly inhibits skin growth. When some of epidermis is removed, less total chalone would be produced, de-inhibiting epidermal cell growth and division.

A bioassay was needed to identify the chemical used for this self-inhibition.
But inhibition of epidermal growth can be caused by many, many chemicals.

Whether chalone really exists, or not, has never been proven.

*********************************************************

Regeneration of newt legs, tail, jaw, neural retina and lens of eye

Lens of eye regenerates from iris (= pigmented retina)
which is very different from its normal embryonic origin.

This one of a few known examples in which cells switch from one differentiated cell type to another

This phenomenon is called "Wolffian Lens Regeneration"

In contrast, Xenopus (frog) tadpoles regenerate lenses by budding of cells from the inner surface of the cornea, which is closely analogous to its normal embryonic development.

[should we look for de-inhibition mechanisms?]

*********************************************************

Regeneration of salamander legs:

Cartilage, muscle and other cell types (seem to) de-differentiate, & form a "blastema" of rapidly dividing undifferentiated cells, which then differentiate to form normal geometry of cartilages and muscle.

But radioactive labeling of chondrocytes and myoblasts indicates little or no switching from one cell type to another.

Does that mean organ shapes are caused by cell rearrangements?
(Instead of spatial control of cell differentiation, as everyone assumes)

If bone and other organ shapes are formed by rearrangement of already differentiated cells during leg regeneration, then is that evidence:

* That replacement legs could be made artificially out of stem cells?

* That normal embryonic formation of bones, muscles etc. is caused by rearrangement of already-differentiated cells?

* Or do you think that salamanders have two completely different mechanisms for making legs?

    One mechanism used in embryos...
    (based mostly on spatial control of cell differentiation)

    A completely different mechanism used if their leg gets cut off?
    (based mostly on rearrangements of differentiated cells)

back to syllabus

back to index page